All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Maintain production efficiencies |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
9893 | Maintain production efficiencies | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Manufacturing and Assembly Processes | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Manufacturing and Assembly | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2004-12-02 | 2005-04-13 | SAQA 1657/04 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2006-04-13 | 2009-04-13 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard is replaced by: |
US ID | Unit Standard Title | Pre-2009 NQF Level | NQF Level | Credits | Replacement Status |
119159 | Maintain manufacturing efficiencies | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 12 |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
Maintaining production efficiencies in a process to achieve quality and output. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
This unit standard has been designed as part of a progression. It is one of a series of unit standards for activities below, at and above this level. The credits assigned to it are based on the assumption that I am learning what is needed for this unit standard as part of my learning for a range of related unit standards at this level or below it.
If I have experience in these related activities but do not have credits for them, I can obtain credits by being assessed through a process that recognises prior learning. If I do not have such experience of related activities, then my learning time will be increased. I can choose to be assessed and obtain credits against those other unit standards as I make progress towards the outcomes of this unit standard. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
This unit standard focuses on the technical aspects of the production process. It is not meant to be a replacement for management or supervisory standards. Issues of work organisation, discipline, grievances, relationships between management and workers are not assessed as part of this standard. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Observe production process. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Check activities, safety, product quality and housekeeping |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Production meets specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results. 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine. capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining. production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Production targets are met. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results. 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine. capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining. production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Machine efficiencies are maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results. 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine. capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining. production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Reports are accurate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results. 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine. capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining. production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Corrective actions are implemented, reviewed and recorded. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results. 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine. capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining. production efficiencies. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Share and discuss information and resolve issues which impact on quality and output. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Production meets specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Production targets are met. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Machine efficiencies are maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Reports are accurate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Corrective actions are implemented, reviewed and recorded. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Identify and report performance and training issues affecting quality. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Production meets specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Production targets are met. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Machine efficiencies are maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Reports are accurate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Corrective actions are implemented, reviewed and recorded. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Record process output and trends. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Process output includes data on materials, process equipment, tooling, the work group, administration and reporting. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Production meets specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Production targets are met. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Machine efficiencies are maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Reports are accurate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Corrective actions are implemented, reviewed and recorded. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Suggest or perform corrective actions to maintain quality and output. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Production meets specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Production targets are met. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Machine efficiencies are maintained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Reports are accurate. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. Corrective actions are implemented, reviewed and recorded. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Scrap and downtime are minimised. 2. Changeover times meet required standard. 3. Problems are attended to in a timely way. 4. Safe working practices are maintained. 5. Corrective actions are cost effective and safe. Understanding confirmed: 1. Explain and discuss the relationship between specifications and test results 2. Explain and discuss issues related to maintenance, morale, tooling design, machine capacities and choice of materials and additives as they relate to maintaining production efficiencies. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
My assessment will be governed by the policies and guidelines of the MERSETA Education and Training Quality Assurer who has jurisdiction over this field of learning. My assessor will (at the very least) be accredited and have a technical qualification in this learning area.
I can be assessed in the language of my choice although if I have to report incidents or conditions to someone else, I will be assessed on my ability to report in the language commonly used in my working environment. I will be assessed in the workplace but I can submit documents, projects, test results and assignments that were not produced in the workplace. I can be assessed against this unit standard to obtain credits or as part of an integrated assessment for a qualification. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Names & functions of:
Attributes, descriptions, characteristics & properties: Sensory cues: Purpose of: Processes, events, causes and effects, implications: Procedures and techniques: Regulations, legislation, agreements, policies, standards Theory: rules, principles, laws Relationships, systems: |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage myself and my activities:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems:
|
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
This unit standard has been replaced by unit standard 119159, which is 'Maintain plastics manufacturing efficiencies', Level 5, 12 credits.
1. This unit standard deals with the change from working with physical processes to working with information 2. It would apply to a technological expert who would link with others, taking a lead role in an activity while still being very much part of the team in the sense of feeding others with information needed to do their jobs (e.g. standing next to a person and helping to solve problems). |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 20891 | National Certificate: Plastics Manufacturing | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2005-04-13 | Was MERSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |