All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
View potentially dangerous animals |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
8459 | View potentially dangerous animals | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Hospitality,Tourism,Travel, Leisure and Gaming | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 11 - Services | Hospitality, Tourism, Travel, Gaming and Leisure | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 30 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2001-06-13 | 2004-06-13 | SAQA 1036/01 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2005-06-13 | 2008-06-13 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The learner achieving this unit standard in combination with other relevant guiding standards will be able to:
|
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that a learner entering a program leading to this unit standard has completed an appropriate unit standard in shooting competency and firearm safety, as well as a unit standard in Field Guiding at least NQF Level 2. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Guides to the scope and complexity of the specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are provided in ranges/points beneath each. These are prefaced by "for example" since they are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity. These are intended only as a general guide to scope and complexity of what is required. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Co-ordinate with other guides and/or operators that there will be no disturbance on a trail. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Ensure no vehicle-bound guides driving into sightings while a trail is in process in the area. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of assessment Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party). Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Ensure that clients know exactly what is expected of them. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Ensure that clients know exactly what is expected of them before coming on trail, while walking and when faced with possible dangerous situations. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Ensure that neutral clothing is worn, give a pre-trail briefing explaining hand signals that will be used, walk in single file, etc. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of assessment Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party). Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Be in control of the group of clients at all times and in all situations in a firm but friendly way. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Ensure that clients always listen to instructions without aggravating them. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of assessment Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party). Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Maintain constant all-round awareness. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Maintain constant all-round awareness to recognise opportunities and avoid any threats to the safety of clients and her/himself, taking into account possible clients' limitations. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Avoiding thick bush where black rhino or lion may be hiding or reed beds where lone buffalo may be hiding, listening to warning sounds (e.g. lion females communicating with their cubs, alarm calls of birds), noting single buffalo spoor, letting clients with bright clothing walk behind him/her, reducing pace when unfit clients present. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of assessment Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party). Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Take the necessary precautions when approaching potentially dangerous game. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Take the necessary precautions when approaching potentially dangerous game to minimise the risk of confrontations and engagements. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Approach game from downwind except when there is a specific reason not to do so, keep a safe distance, make use of the sun, trees, rocks, etc. to avoid detection, plan possible escape routes, withdraw upon signs of discomfort by the animals. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of assessment Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party). Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Deal efficiently with any unexpected confrontations by dangerous animals. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Get clients to back off in an orderly and controlled fashion, shoot the animal and kill it with a maximum of two shots if there is absolutely no other alternative. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of assessment Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party). Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 7 |
Handle his/her firearm efficiently. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Handle his/her firearm in such a way that it is ready when needed without endangering the safety of clients. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Magazine loaded but no rounds in the chamber except when actually intending to shoot an animal out of necessity, ensuring that clients never have access to rifle, never intentionally or unintentionally pointing the rifle at any person. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of assessment Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party). Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 8 |
Ensure efficient communication with a "back-up" person. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
Where a "back-up" participates on the trail, ensure efficient communication with this person to enhance the safety of the group. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Have pre-arranged communication and emergency procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment; formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. Method of assessment Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions. Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner. Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment. Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard. Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party). Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
1. Anyone assessing a learner or moderating the assessment of a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA.
2. Any institution offering learning that will enable the achievement of this unit standard must be accredited as a provider with the relevant ETQA. 3. Assessment and moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the ETQA's policies and guidelines for assessment and moderation; in terms of agreements reached around assessment and moderation between ETQA's (including professional bodies); and in terms of the moderation guideline detailed under point 4 immediately below. 4. Moderation must include both internal and external moderation of assessments at exit points of the qualification, unless ETQA policies specify otherwise. Moderation should also encompass achievement of the competence described both in individual unit standards as well as the integrated competence described in the qualification. Anyone wishing to be assessed against this qualification may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The qualifying learner is able to demonstrate a basic knowledge and understanding of:
1. Sound knowledge of the area of operation. 2. Guest management and control. 3. Sound experiential knowledge of the behaviour of all potentially dangerous animals and its potential implications. 4. Legislation pertaining to the guiding of trails (e.g. relevant sections of the Tourism act and the Firearms Control Act). 5. All rules and procedures applicable to the area of operation. 6. Field craft. |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Problem solving relates to the following specific outcomes:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Team work relates to the following specific outcomes:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Self organisation and management relates to all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Information evaluation relates to the following specific outcomes:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communication relates to the following specific outcomes:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use of science and technology relates to the following specific outcome:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Inter-relatedness of systems relates to the following specific outcomes:
|
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Values
Demonstration of the knowledge and skills outlined in this unit standard must be consistent with the principles of: 1. Respect for ecological processes and cultural integrity. 2. Accepting and maintaining a non-discriminatory attitude towards diversity including, for example, differences in gender, race, religion, physical ability and culture. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 20155 | National Certificate: Tourism: Guiding | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2009-09-09 | Was CATHSSETA until Last Date for Achievement |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |