All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate an understanding of ship stability |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
261077 | Demonstrate an understanding of ship stability | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Maritime Defence | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security | Sovereignty of the State | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard is intended for learners within the Maritime Sector who work/wish to work as an officer on the bridge of a ship. This Unit Standard meets the needs of the sub-field and of the society by providing competent maritime officers who by being able to maintain the stability of a ship, contributes to a safer environment on the ship and at sea. The learner successfully completing this Unit Standard will gain essential knowledge and practical skills required to determine whether a ship has sufficient stability to put to sea and can maintain positive stability in a seaway.
The competencies achieved by the learner in this Unit Standard will, in the case of the Merchant Navy and the Fishing Industry, contribute to the economic upliftment of the country, and in the case of the South African Navy, contribute the preservation of human life and the defence of South African warships, territorial waters and/or area of responsibility, thus providing a safer and secure society for South African citizens. Learners credited with this unit standard will be able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
It is assumed that the learner has the following knowledge and skills:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Demonstrate an understanding of ship stability assessment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
An explanation is given of the relationship between the mass of a ship and the volume of water it displaces with reference to Archimedes' principle. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The explanation includes light displacement, load displacement, deadweight, tonnes per centimetre immersion (TPC), density, displacement/draught curve, deadweight curve/scale, Tonnes Per Centimetre scale and Tonnes Per Centimetre formulae. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A description is given of the statical stability of a ship afloat with reference to the relationship between stability, righting lever and righting moment for small and large angles of heel. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The explanation includes centre of gravity, centre of buoyancy, metacentre, metacentric height (GM), righting lever (GZ), righting moment, "stiff" and "tender" as well as their associated dangers, stable and unstable, neutral equilibrium and capsizing moment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A description is given of the dynamics of a ship at the angle of loll in terms of the dangers of a ship rolling about this angle of loll. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
A description is given of how stability curves are used to determine accurately the metacentric height and the range of stability of a ship. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
A description is given of the effect of the down flooding angle on the curve of stability for a particular ship in terms of its implications for ship stability. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Demonstrate an understanding of the effects of the movement of the centre of gravity on the ship during loading operations or while on passage. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
An explanation is given of the relationship between centre of gravity, centre of buoyancy and metacentric height with reference to the stability of the ship. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The movement of the centre of gravity of a ship during loading operations is demonstrated with the aid of diagrams and calculations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The change in Ship's Center of Gravity Above Keel (KG) is calculated resulting from consumption of fuel, stores, absorption of water by deck cargo and accumulation of ice on upper decks and superstructure. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Demonstrate understanding of the effect of slack and fresh water tanks on ship stability. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
An explanation is given of the movement of the centre of gravity in a partly filled tank during rolling with reference to the free surface effect. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
An explanation is given of the implications for Ship's Center of Gravity Above Keel (KG)of a partially filled space with reference to the effects of breadth and mass of liquid contained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A description is given of specific ship construction measures with reference to their impact on free surface effects. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
A description is given of the procedures for ballasting tanks with reference to their impact on a ship at an angle of loll or with a small positive Metacentric Height (GM). |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
An explanation is given of the relationship between draft and density of seawater or dock water with reference to implications for ship stability. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Demonstrate understanding of the fundamentals of watertight integrity. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
A description is given of watertight integrity in terms of the consequences for stability, trim and stress. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A description is given of the consequences for the ship of partial loss of intact buoyancy, together with actions to be taken to maintain ship stability. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A description is given of actions that must be taken to to ensure and maintain the watertight integrity of the ship. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Embedded knowledge includes:
|
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identifying and solving problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collecting, analysing, organising and critically evaluating information to better understand and explain:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
The following scope and context applies to the whole unit standard:
|
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 64929 | National Certificate: Vessel Safety Practices | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |