All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate an understanding of security measures within a port security environment |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
252174 | Demonstrate an understanding of security measures within a port security environment | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Security | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security | Safety in Society | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 4 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard will enable maritime security officers to implement and apply maritime security measures within a port security environment. Learners who complete this unit standard will contribute effectively to maritime security within the maritime security sector. Learners will be able to contextualise their competencies with regard to the requirements of maritime security according to prescribed international security standards. The person credited with this unit standard will be able to interpret and implement maritime security legislation policies, procedures and measures within the port environment. They will also be able to define the responsibilities of various stakeholders, regulating bodies and role players within the maritime security environment. This unit standard will also enable the person to use and apply security measures and procedures and identify maritime security threats and breaches, record and appropriately report their findings.
The qualifying learner will be capable of: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
In this unit standard a maritime security environment refers to a seaport where ship-port interface takes place as delineated in, but not restricted to, the International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code as well as the Maritime Security Regulations of 2004. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Describe legislative and legal prescripts applicable to a maritime security environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Relevant sections in current legislation pertaining to maritime security are described in terms of their impact on security operations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Legislation may include but is not limited to regulations and international standards such as the Merchant Shipping (Maritime Security) Regulations 2004 (issued to the Merchant Shipping Act, no 30 of 1959), South African Maritime Safety Authority (SAMSA) Act 5 of 1998, National Ports Act, no 12 of 2005, Control of Access to Public Premises, Vehicles Act, no 53 of 1985 and Immigration Act 13 of 2002, It also refers to regulations and standards set by organisations such as the International Maritime Organisation (IMO), particularly the International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code and other relevant IMO Regulations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The impact of the international security related conventions is described in terms of their influence on maritime security. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Conventions may refer to but are not limited to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) of 1974, as amended, the ISPS Code and the 12 December 2002 Conference Resolutions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Standards and requirements relating to seaport security environment are described in order to identify offences within a maritime security environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Standards relate to those rules that are established and documented in maritime security plans as described in Part 1 of the ISPS Code. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Describe the roles and responsibilities of stakeholders within a maritime security environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Responsibilities of maritime security officers are described with examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Maritime industry participants are identified in terms of their specific roles and responsibilities within a maritime environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Maritime industry participants include but are not limited to seaport specific role-players who are effective within a maritime or seaport environment, as defined in the International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code and the Maritime Security Regulations of 2004. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Stakeholders are identified in terms of their roles and responsibilities within a particular maritime security environment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Stakeholders refer to all maritime industry participants with maritime security roles and responsibilities as well as the various state agencies involved in maritime security as defined and described in the International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code as well as the Maritime Security Regulations of 2004. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Describe the standard security measures and procedures to be applied at various maritime security levels. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The standard security measures and procedures to be applied at Maritime Security Level One are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Maritime Security Level One is the level for which, minimum appropriate protective measures will be maintained at all times. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The standard security measures and procedures to be applied at Maritime Security Level Two are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Maritime Security Level Two is the level for which appropriate additional protective security measures shall be maintained for a period of time as a result of heightened risk of a security incident. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The standard security measures and procedures to be applied at Maritime Security Level Three are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Maritime Security Level Three is the level for which further specific protective security measures shall be maintained for a period of time when a security incident is probable or imminent. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Stakeholders and Maritime Industry Participants are characterised in terms of their roles and responsibilities in line with the given maritime security levels. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems related to incidents within a maritime environment. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of the maritime security fraternity. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organize and critically evaluate information related to crime prevention specific to the maritime security environment and communicate such information timeously and confidentially to appropriate stakeholders. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Understand the world as a set of related systems in which continued threat assessments are conducted to ensure pro-active crime prevention. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Act and respond effectively when dealing with maritime security incidents, clients, public and official institutions to contribute to the overall quality management system of the maritime security sector. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 58577 | National Certificate: General Security Practices | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |