SAQA

All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.

SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE:

Deploy torpedoes tactically under operational conditions

SAQA US ID	UNIT STANDARD TITLE
244627	Deploy torpedoes tactically under operational conditions
ORIGINATOR
SGB Maritime Defence
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-
FIELD			SUBFIELD
Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security			Safety in Society
ABET BAND	UNIT STANDARD TYPE	PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL	NQF LEVEL	CREDITS
Undefined	Regular	Level 5	Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5	8
REGISTRATION STATUS		REGISTRATION START DATE	REGISTRATION END DATE	SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"		2018-07-01	2023-06-30	SAQA 06120/18
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT		LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2024-06-30		2027-06-30

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.

This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard.

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD

This unit standard will be useful for people who have completed the introductory courses to warship safety management and bridge watch keping (submarines) within a naval context, and wish to progress as officers within a sub-surface environment.

This unit standard will give them the opportunity to develop and balance their practical skills with the essential knowledge needed to earn a formal qualification in Submarine Operations Management. More specifically, it provides for the recognition of the knowledge to work safely with torpedoes, and deploy them effectively.

People credited with this unit standard are able to:

Locate and identify torpedo system components.

Prepare to deploy torpedoes under operational conditions.

Fire the torpedo.

Track and report on torpedo deployment.

LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING

It is assumed that learners are competent in Communications at NQF Level 4 and that they have successfully completed the, "Orientation to submarine services in the SAN." programme.

UNIT STANDARD RANGE

Specific range statements are provided in the body of the unit standard where they apply to particular specific outcomes or assessment criteria.

Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1

Locate and identify torpedo system components.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

Torpedo system components are located and identified correctly in terms of their positioning on weapons system drawings.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

The purpose of torpedo system components are explained according to the manufacturer's specifications.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

All equipment and systems are checked and ensured to be operational and ready for deployment.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE

Torpedo system components include:

Torpedo; torpedo tubes and wires; valves, compensation tanks, pressure gauges and batteries.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4

Different modes for operating and firing the torpedoes are described according to their design specifications.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE

Modes for torpedo operation include:

Snapshot firing, bearing rider, collision course, interception and straight running.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5

The key differences between exercise and combat torpedoes are described with reference to their design and purpose in the submarine weapons system.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6

The capabilities and limitations of torpedo weapon systems are explained and described with reference to distance, accuracy, speed and explosive force, in line with manufacturer's specifications.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7

Conditions favourable to torpedo deployment are listed and examples given illustrate the context in which torpedoes are successfully deployed.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8

Conditions unfavourable to torpedo deployment are described and examples given illustrate the context in which weapons deployment are aborted.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2

Prepare to deploy torpedoes under operational conditions.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

Tactical information gathered from the appropriate stations is accurate and confirms the viability of the selected firing option.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

Safety markings and tags on equipment are inspected and confirmed to be current.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

Safety checks and inspections on torpedo system components are conducted in a manner that ensures safe torpedo deployment and a favourable launch.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE

System components include:

Torpedo and torpedo casing, wires, torpedo tubes, pressure gauges, valves, compensation tanks, batteries.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4

Torpedoes are armed and loaded into torpedo tubes according to standard operating procedures, and in line with established safety precautions.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3

Fire the torpedo.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

Information presented to Command provides an accurate picture of the target, relative speeds, and firing options and enables effective decision-aking with respect to firing the torpedo.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

Commands to fire the torpedo are confirmed according to establish operating procedures.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

Commands are given for firing of torpedoes are clearly, concisely and correctly according to naval terminology.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4

Lines of communication with the operations room are maintained to ensure personnel are kept up to date and aware of the overall situation.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5

Safety of personnel and the vessel is maintained at all times.

SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4

Track and report on torpedo deployment.

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1

Information on the run of the torpedo is gathered form the appropriate stations and equipment and analysed accurately.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2

Commentary on the run provides a clear and accurate picture of the track in relation to selected firing option.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3

Deviant torpedoes or misses are noted, reported and new options developed and presented in line with the command priority.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4

Debriefing sessions on the firing of torpedoes are conducted in a positive and constructive manner, and information gathered is collated to support continuous improvement.

ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5

Own role is evaluated for impact on the torpedo firing, and the contribution to accurate and successful deployment.

UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS

Anyone assessing a learner or moderating the assessment of a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA.

Any institution offering learning that will enable the achievement of this unit standard must be accredit as a provider with the relevant ETQA.

Assessment and moderation of assessment will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the ETQA's policies and guidelines for assessment and moderation.

Moderation must include both internal and external moderation of assessments at exit points of the qualification, unless ETQA policies are specified otherwise. Moderation should also encompass achievement of the competence described both in individual unit standards as well as the integrated competence described in the qualification.

UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE

SOLAS Convention (specifically Chapter V).

STCW Convention (specifically Chapters II and VIII).

Merchant Shipping Notices.

Marine Radar Performance Specifications.

Automatic Radar Plotting Aids Performance Specifications.

Reports of Courts of Marine Enquiry relevant to safe navigation.

Marine Accident Investigation Bureau reports relevant to safe navigation.

UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME

N/A

UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES

N/A

Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO):

UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING

Identify and solve problems and make decisions using critical and creative thinking.

UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING

Work effectively with others as members of a team, group, organisation or community.

UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING

Organise and manage themselves and their activities responsibly and effectively.

UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING

Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information.

UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING

Communicate effectively, using visual, mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written presentations.

UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE

Use science and technology effectively and critically showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others.

UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING

Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation.

UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA

N/A

REREGISTRATION HISTORY

As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015.

UNIT STANDARD NOTES

Notes to Assessors:

Assessors should keep the following general principles in mind when designing and conducting assessments against this unit standard:

Focus the assessment activities on gathering evidence in terms of the main outcome expressed in the title to ensure assessment is integrated rather than fragmented. Remember we want to declare the person competent in terms of the title. Where assessment at title level is unmanageable, then focus assessment around each specific outcome, or groups of specific outcomes.

Make sure that evidence is gathered across the entire range, wherever it applies. Assessment activities should be as close to the real performance as possible, and where simulations or role-plays are used, there should be supporting evidence to show the candidate is able to perform in the real situation.

Do not focus the assessment activities on each assessment criterion. Rather make sure the assessment activities focus on outcomes and are sufficient to enable evidence to be gathered around all the assessment criteria.

The assessment criteria provide the specifications against which assessment judgements should be made. In most cases, knowledge can be inferred from the quality of the performances, but in other cases, knowledge and understanding will have to be tested through questioning techniques. Where this is required, there will be assessment criteria to specify the standard required.

The task of the assessor is to gather sufficient evidence, of the prescribed type and quality, as specified in this unit standard, that the candidate can achieve the outcomes again and again and again. This means assessors will have to judge how many repeat performances are required before they believe the performance is reproducible.

All assessments should be conducted in line with the following well documented principles of assessment: appropriateness, fairness, manageability, integration into work or learning, validity, direct, authentic, sufficient, systematic, open and consistent.

The following particular issues should be taken into consideration when assessing against this unit standard:

Every candidate for certification shall:

Be required to demonstrate the competence to undertake, at operational level, the tasks, duties and responsibilities listed in the STCW Code (Table A-II/1).

At least hold an appropriate certificate for performing VHF radio-communications in accordance with the requirements of the Radio Regulations.

If designated to have primary responsibility for radio-communications during distress incidents, hold an appropriate certificate issued or recognised under the provisions of the Radio Regulations.

In addition, every candidate for certification shall:

Be required to provide evidence of having achieved the required standard of competence in accordance with the methods for demonstrating competence and the criteria for evaluating competence tabulated in STCW Code (Table A-II/1).

Definition of Terms:

Terms have been clarified as far as possible through the use of range statements. Further clarification of terms is provided as follows:

Officer means a member of the crew, other than the Captain (or Master), designated as such by international law or regulations or, in the absence of such designation, by collective agreement or custom.

Rating means a member of the ship's crew other than the Captain (or Master) or an officer.

STCW Code means the Seafarer's Training, Certification and Watchkeeping (STCW) Code as adopted by the 1995 Conference resolution 2, as it may be amended.

Seagoing service means service on board a ship relevant to the issue of a certificate or other qualification.

Standard of competence means the level of proficiency to be achieved for the proper performance of functions on board ship in accordance with the internationally agreed criteria.

Management level means the level of responsibility associated with:
> Serving as captain (or master) or first officer on board a submarine.
> Ensuring that all functions within the designated area of responsibility are properly performed.

Operational level means:
> Serving as officer in charge of a navigational watch on board a submarine.
> Maintaining direct control over the performance of all functions within the designated area of responsibility in accordance with proper procedures and under the direction of an individual serving in the management level for that area of responsibility.

Naval architecture means engineering discipline dealing with the design, construction and repair of marine vehicles.

QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD:

	ID	QUALIFICATION TITLE	PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL	NQF LEVEL	STATUS	END DATE	PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
Core	58840	National Certificate: Submarine Operations	Level 5	Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5	Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered"	2023-06-30	SAS SETA

PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD:

This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.

NONE