All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Contribute to the development of specialist component strategies of an integrated transport plan |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
244250 | Contribute to the development of specialist component strategies of an integrated transport plan | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Transport and Logistics Operations | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 11 - Services | Transport, Operations and Logistics | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | 30 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This unit standard will enable learners to contribute to the development of specialist component strategies of an integrated transport plan in the transport planning field. This unit standard will benefit learners within the transport planning sector and contributes to professionalism within transport planning processes and systems.
A person credited with this unit standard is able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Specialist component strategies include but are not limited to freight, public transport planning (including universal access), non-motorised transport, travel demand management, road safety, infrastructure. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Analyse the typical problems and issues related to specialist areas of an integrated transport plan. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Specialist areas include but are not limited to freight, public transport (including universal access), non-motorised transport, travel demand management, road safety, infrastructure. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The role of the specialist areas are interrogated to determine their systemic effects on the transport system. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Data needs, sources and analysis methods are identified to assess the typical problems and issues related to each specialist area. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A trend analysis is completed to assess underlying drivers of change within each specialist area. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The actual state of a specialist area is compared to the policy target to determine the gap and the extent of the problem. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Critically analyse the range of typical interventions to address problems and issues associated with each specialist area. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Specialist areas include but are not limited to freight, public transport (including universal access), non-motorised transport, travel demand management, road safety, infrastructure. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Interventions and strategies related to each specific specialist area are identified and described in order to assess feasibility in own context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The context within which precedent interventions have been implemented is analysed in order to compare with local contextual conditions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Contextual conditions include but are not limited to institutions, legislation, planning frameworks, resources. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Precedent interventions are reviewed to determine levels of success and the reasons for success. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The local contextual conditions are analysed to determine the feasibility of implementing specific precedent interventions. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Assessment criteria are developed in order to critically and systematically assess the feasibility of alternative precedent interventions in the local context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
A set of assessment criteria are applied to each specialist area in order to determine the feasibility of alternative precedent interventions in the local context. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Communicate analysis, findings and recommendations in support of a component strategy in each specialist area. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Communication techniques and formats are identified and selected in order to advise stakeholders and decision makers. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The problem analysis and critical review of interventions are compiled into a motivation for a proposed strategy associated with each specialist area. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The motivation is presented so that it reflects the sequenced stages in the strategy formulation and implementation process to develop component strategies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Srategy formulation includes but not limited to problem identification, generation of alternative strategies, impact assessment and evaluation, selection of strategy, project design and costing, programming and prioritisation and monitoring and revision. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Major resource implications of proposed strategy are identified and included in the motivation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The motivation situates each component strategy within the context of an integrated transport plan in order to demonstrate linkages and synergies between planned components. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Purpose of processes and procedures of:
Cause and effect, implications of: Procedures and techniques: Regulations, legislation, agreements, policies: Theory - rules, laws, principles: Relationships, systems: |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identifying and solving problems in which responses display that responsible decisions using critical and creative thinking have been made when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Working effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation, and community during:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organising and managing oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collecting, analysing, organising and critically evaluating information to better understand and explain:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Using science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others when:
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrating an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation when:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 58601 | National Certificate: Land Transport Planning | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2012-06-30 | LG SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |