All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate an understanding of the field of forensic questioned documents |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
244147 | Demonstrate an understanding of the field of forensic questioned documents | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Forensic Science | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security | Safety in Society | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 10 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
On completion of this unit standard the learner will be able to understand the elementary components of the field of forensic questioned documents. This unit standard is intended as an introduction to the specialized field of forensic questioned documents.
On completion of this unit standard the learner will understand elementary concepts of handwriting, signatures and printing processes that underlie the examination of disputed documents for the purpose of forensic investigations. The learner will also be familiar with the concepts of marks and indentations as indicators of forged documents and have a background to the falsification of documents for purposes of identification. A person credited with this unit standard will be able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Demonstrate an understanding of the characteristics of handwriting and signatures used in questioned document examinations. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
Characteristics refer to elementary characteristics and not detailed aspects of handwriting and signatures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The development of handwriting is explained in terms of the history of handwriting. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The concept of handwriting refers, but is not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Handwriting characteristics are described in terms of forensic questioned documents examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Characteristics refer to, but are not limited to:
Line quality refers to, but is not limited to: Movement refers to, but is not limited to: > Finger, hand, forearm, whole arm. Tremor refers to, but is not limited to: Pen position refers to, but is not limited to: Arrangement refers to, but is not limited to: > Spacing, baseline, margins, symmetry of width, line directions, relationship of sub-sections (letterheads, introductions and conclusion) to content and other sub-sections, paragraphing, margins, use of symbols and signs, insertions, connections between words, number of words, punctuation marks and underlinings. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Variation of handwriting is demonstrated in terms of forensic questioned document examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Factors causing variation in handwriting here refer to, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Disguised (distorted) handwriting is explained in terms of forensic questioned documents examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Methods of disguise refer to, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Principles of forgery in signatures are described in terms of forensic questioned document examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Principles of forging signatures refer to, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Initials and marks in handwriting and signatures are explained in terms of forensic questioned documents examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Initials and marks are defined according to the nature, use and styles thereof. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
Influences on signatures are demonstrated in terms of forensic questioned document examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Influences refer, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
Different writing instruments are explained according to its effect on handwriting and signatures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Writing instruments refer to but are not limited:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 9 |
Different types of inks are described according to its physical and chemical qualities. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Inks refer to but are not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Demonstrate an understanding of printing processes related to questioned document examination. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Printing processes are explained according to the printing methodologies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Printing processes must include, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The development of typewriters is explained in terms of elementary functioning principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Printers are described in terms of elementary functioning principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Printers refer to but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Copiers are described in terms of elementary functioning principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Copiers refer to but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The facsimile apparatus is described in terms of elementary functioning principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Functioning principles refer to but are not limited to: thermal printing and ink jet printing. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Explain the use of marks and indentations on documents in terms of forensic questioned document examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Latent marks on documents are described according to forensic document examination principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Latent marks include, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Paper binding methods and folds are described according to their impact on questioned documents in forensic examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Paper binding methods include, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The impact of ink transfer on documents is explained in context to forensic questioned document principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Use refers to, but is not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Stamp types are explained in context to disputed documents in forensic investigations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Stamp types refer to but are not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Document forgery methods are described in context to forensic questioned document examinations. |
OUTCOME RANGE |
This specific outcome only refers to forging of documents by erasure and alterations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Erasures and alterations to original documents are described in context of forensic examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Types refer to, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The effect of different types of paper tears and cuts on documents is described in context to forensic examinations of questioned documents. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Paper tears and cuts here refer to, but are not limited to:
|
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The impact of damage to documents is explained in context of forensic questioned document examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Damage refers to but is not limited to:
|
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Explain the falsfication of documents for purposes of identification. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Types of documents for purposes of identification are named by using examples. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Security characteristics in passports and identity documents are described in context to forensic questioned document examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Methods of falsification of documents for purposes of identification are explained in context to forensic questioned document examinations. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Methods refer to but are not limited to:
Documents refer to but are not limited to: identity documents and passports. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems in which responses display that responsible decisions, using critical thinking, have been made. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or community. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical, and/or language skills in the modes of written and/or oral presentation. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically, show responsibility towards the environment and the health of others. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Contribute to the full personal development of each learner and the social and economic development of the society at large, by making it the underlying intention of any programme of learning to make an individual aware of the importance of:
|
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Glossary of Terminology:
|
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 57651 | National Certificate: Forensic Science | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
Elective | 66869 | National Certificate: Home Affairs Services | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | PSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |