All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Strategically lead public sector change |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
242908 | Strategically lead public sector change | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Public Administration and Management | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 03 - Business, Commerce and Management Studies | Public Administration | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 7 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L7 | 12 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
This Unit Standard is intended for elected political leaders and public sector officials involved with the service delivery activities at a top strategic level. This Unit Standard contributes to the development of management capacity to operate effectively and appropriately in change management processes required to achieve the overall objectives of the public sector. The qualifying learner will be able to align organisational culture, change management frameworks and strategic objectives. The learner will also be able to address the specific challenging in implementing and evaluating public sector change and cultural change.
The qualifying learner is capable of: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
All learners accessing this unit standard must be in possession of Level 6 Public Administration diploma, degree or equivalent. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
N/A |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Identify own leadership and management style, strengths and shortcomings. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Key aspects of various theories of management and leadership are identified and described in the context of a public sector leader/manager. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A competency audit is undertaken to determine own leadership and management style, strengths and weaknesses. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
A plan to address weaknesses whilst optimising strengths is drawn up in relation to specific work context and overall public sector objectives. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Practical personal development tools are identified and incorporated into own personal development plan for addressing weaknesses and competency areas that are lacking. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Key factors are analysed in respect of how personal leadership style affect change management objectives. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Key factors include but are not limited to personal change readiness, dealing with resistance to change, use of personal power and influence to effect change, stress levels and personal coping strategies, the ability to embed cultural change, the ability to deal with diverse and complex issues and stakeholders and the ability to deal with uncertainty. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Demonstrate an understanding of the complexity of drivers for change in the public sector environment and manage under uncertainty. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The challenges, trends and developments facing own public sector organisation are analysed in the context of change management goals and wider public sector objectives. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Trends include but are not limited to legal, legal, economic, social, technological, national, international, causes, effects, ends, that provide a conceptual model to understand the present. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Visionary skills and scenario planning techniques are applied to determine medium and long-term trends and determine the change requirements for the public sector in line with these trends. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Public sector readiness for change is analysed in context of the various scenario's. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Various drivers required for change to be effected are determined in line with public sector objectives and strategies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Potential sources of resistance are analysed and a communication strategy determined accordingly. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Recognise the value of diversity in change leadership styles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The personal, team and entity factors at work in shaping how public sector employees perceive and respond to major change and reform are analysed in line with various scenario's. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
A competency audit is initiated to determine the mix of competences, skills and talents required fulfil change requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The shifts required in organisational culture required to effect change management processes and strategies are determined in line with overall change strategies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The guiding coalition required to ensure the success of change is identified in the context of the longer-term change management strategies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The guiding coalition includes but is not limited to internal stakeholders, employees, external stakeholders, prominent role-players such as visionaries, advisers, influencers. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The methods for engaging others in change are defined and communicated to respective change agents within public sector. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Apply various frameworks for the planning and implementing of change management strategies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Suitable change management frameworks for the public sector are identified and tested for reliability, implementation success and integrity. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The most appropriate model is identified and a change management strategy drawn up accordingly. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Risk assessment is applied to change management strategies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Process change control systems are understood and explained in the context of effecting change and applied to overall strategy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Change strategies are defined and specified in accordance with public service protocols. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Methods for evaluating efficacy of strategy are determined and built in as benchmarks. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The strategy is communicated and implemented according to protocols, frameworks and roll out plans. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Communicate change processes to all stakeholders. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The change communication process is understood and described in the context of overall change management strategy. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
The change communication process includes, but is not limited to, communication planning, information distribution, knowledge management performance reporting, and administrative closure, engagement, empowerment, motivational devices. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Communication planning inputs, techniques and outputs are understood and described in the context of communicating change to all stakeholders. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Communication planning inputs, techniques and outputs include, but are not limited to, communication requirements, communication technology, constraints and assumptions, stakeholder analysis. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Information distribution inputs, techniques and outputs are understood and described in the context of communicating change to all stakeholders. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Information distribution inputs, techniques and outputs include, but are not limited to, communication management plan, project planning techniques, communication skills, information retrieval systems, information distribution systems, and communication records. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Performance reporting inputs, techniques and outputs are understood and described in the context of communicating change to all stakeholders. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Performance reporting inputs, techniques and outputs include, but are not limited to, communication plan, work results, record, performance reviews, variance analysis, trend analysis, and information distribution techniques. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Administrative closure inputs, techniques and outputs are understood and described in the context of communicating change to all stakeholders. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Administrative closure inputs, techniques and outputs include, but are not limited to, performance measurement documentation, documentation of the communication specification, communication records, performance reporting, communication archives, final communication project report, lessons learned. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Evaluate the effectiveness of change programmes. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The various tools and benchmarks for measuring efficacy of change are utilised on an ongoing basis. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Organisational and cultural change are evaluated against objectives, trends and strategies. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Resistance to change is evaluated and methods for overcoming resistance of revised accordingly. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Those aspects needing more attention as change intervention unfolds are prioritised and addressed according to public sector protocols. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems using critical and creative thinking processes in order analyse trends that affect change within the public sector. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or community to ensure that change initiatives are effectively implemented. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly in order to proactively keep abreast of trends and development that may effect change. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information in order to interpret how trends and developments will affect change within public sector. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively using visual, mathematical and/or language in the modes of oral and/or written persuasion to facilitate change management processes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility to the environment and health of others, as a tool to keep abreast of trends and developments that may affect change in public sector, and to ensure that change management systems are effectively implemented. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of interrelated systems by recognising that problem solving contexts relating the public service change do not exist in isolation and that a variety of factors, sensitivities and stakeholders may impact on overall organisational and sector change. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 57827 | National Diploma: Public Administration | Level 7 | Level N/A: Pre-2009 was L7 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | PSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |