|
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
| SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
| REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
| Present information in a public setting |
| SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
| 13925 | Present information in a public setting | |||
| ORIGINATOR | ||||
| SGB Sport | ||||
| PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
| - | ||||
| FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
| Field 02 - Culture and Arts | Sport | |||
| ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
| Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 5 |
| REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
|
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
| LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
| 2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 | |||
| In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
| PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
| Confidently conduct a presentation in various settings ranging from a corporate wellness program to a lecture, an informal discussion or a sports team. |
| LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
| Communication equivalent to NQF 4. |
| UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
| Guides to the scope and complexity of the specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge are provided in bullet points beneath each. These are prefaced by "for example" since they are neither comprehensive nor necessarily appropriate to all contexts. Alternatives must however be comparable in scope and complexity. These are intended only as a general guide to scope and complexity of what is required. |
| Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
| Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience. |
| OUTCOME NOTES |
| 1. Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience.
For Example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Material is presented in an organized manner. 2. Visual aids are suitably prepared with appropriate content/wording/style for the audience. 3. The content of the presentation is relevant to the audience in terms of its size, age, needs and objectives. 4. Presents in a confident and professional manner. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. An environment is created for questions to be fielded and answered. 6. Presentation is adapted according to the audience's responses. |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
| Prepare and organize presentation material. |
| OUTCOME NOTES |
| 2. Prepare and organize presentation material.
For Example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Material is presented in an organized manner. 2. Visual aids are suitably prepared with appropriate content/wording/style for the audience. 3. The content of the presentation is relevant to the audience in terms of its size, age, needs and objectives. 4. Presents in a confident and professional manner. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. An environment is created for questions to be fielded and answered. 6. Presentation is adapted according to the audience's responses. |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
| Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment. |
| OUTCOME NOTES |
| 3. Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment.
For Example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Material is presented in an organized manner. 2. Visual aids are suitably prepared with appropriate content/wording/style for the audience. 3. The content of the presentation is relevant to the audience in terms of its size, age, needs and objectives. 4. Presents in a confident and professional manner. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. An environment is created for questions to be fielded and answered. 6. Presentation is adapted according to the audience's responses. |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
| Display optimal presentation skills. |
| OUTCOME NOTES |
| 4. Display optimal presentation skills.
For Example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Material is presented in an organized manner. 2. Visual aids are suitably prepared with appropriate content/wording/style for the audience. 3. The content of the presentation is relevant to the audience in terms of its size, age, needs and objectives. 4. Presents in a confident and professional manner. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. An environment is created for questions to be fielded and answered. 6. Presentation is adapted according to the audience's responses. |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
| Perform self-monitoring and adapt the presentation. |
| OUTCOME NOTES |
| 5. Perform self-monitoring and adapt the presentation.
For Example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Material is presented in an organized manner. 2. Visual aids are suitably prepared with appropriate content/wording/style for the audience. 3. The content of the presentation is relevant to the audience in terms of its size, age, needs and objectives. 4. Presents in a confident and professional manner. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. An environment is created for questions to be fielded and answered. 6. Presentation is adapted according to the audience's responses. |
| SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
| Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation. |
| OUTCOME NOTES |
| 6. Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation.
For Example: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
| ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
| When conducting assessments, assessors must ensure that they are familiar with the full text of the Unit Standards being assessed.
They must ensure that the assessment covers the specific outcomes, critical cross-field outcomes and essential embedded knowledge. As each situation is different, it will be necessary to develop assessment activities and tools, which are appropriate to the contexts in which practitioners are working. These activities and tools may include self-assessment, peer assessment, formative and summative assessment. The specific outcomes and essential embedded knowledge must be assessed in relation to each other. If a practitioner is able to explain the essential embedded knowledge but is unable to perform the specific outcomes, they should not be assessed as competent. Similarly, if a practitioner is able to perform the specific outcomes but is unable to explain or justify their performance in terms of the essential embedded knowledge, they should not be assessed as competent. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT Assessment should include practical demonstration of competence, either in the workplace or through work-realistic, out-of-classroom simulation. A range of assessment methods should be used, including: Direct observation - watch the practitioner carry out the task or produce a desired outcome during the course of his or her normal work under normal workplace conditions Product sample - examine the outcomes previously produced by the practitioner Simulation of a specific task - set a specific task for the practitioner to demonstrate in a simulated environment Questioning (verbal or written) - ask relevant questions linked to the unit standard Testimony - collect a portfolio of evidence from suitable people (e.g.: reports from a third party) Integrated assessment It may be more effective and efficient to assess a number of unit standards together thus reducing the overall number of assessment 'events'. Assessing the following will ensure the specific outcomes; essential embedded knowledge and critical-cross-field outcomes are assessed: Demonstrated ability to make DECISIONS about practice and to ACT accordingly: 1. Material is presented in an organized manner. 2. Visual aids are suitably prepared with appropriate content/wording/style for the audience. 3. The content of the presentation is relevant to the audience in terms of its size, age, needs and objectives. 4. Presents in a confident and professional manner. Demonstrated ability to learn from our actions and to ADAPT PERFORMANCE: 5. An environment is created for questions to be fielded and answered. 6. Presentation is adapted according to the audience's responses. |
| UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
Anyone wishing to be assessed against this qualification may apply to be assessed by any assessment agency, assessor or provider institution, which is accredited by the relevant ETQA. |
| UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
| 1. Operation of technical equipment.
2. Appropriate software programs. 3. Content knowledge specific to the presentation. 4. Public speaking skills. 5. Facilitation skills. 6. Research skills referring to content, environment, audience. 7. Ability to structure and adapt presentation according to the characteristics and needs of the audience. 8. Cultural considerations. 9. Self-organisation skills. 10. Factors of and ways of overcoming fear of public speaking. 11. Techniques to deal with own anxiety. 12. Techniques to research the environment. |
| Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
| Problem solving relates to:
Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience. For Example: Perform self-monitoring and adapt the presentation. For Example: Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation. For Example: |
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
| Teamwork relates to:
Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience. For Example: Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment. For Example: Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation. For Example: |
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
| Self-organisation and management relates to:
Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience. For Example: Prepare and organize presentation material. For Example: Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment. For Example: |
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
| Information evaluation relates to:
Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience. For Example: Prepare and organize presentation material. For Example: Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment. For Example: Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation. For Example: |
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
| Communication relates to:
Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience. For Example: Display optimal presentation skills. For Example: Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation. For Example: |
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
| Use of science and technology relates to:
Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience. For Example: Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment. For Example: |
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
| Inter-relatedness of systems relates to:
Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience. For Example: Prepare and organize presentation material. For Example: Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment. For Example: Display optimal presentation skills. For Example: Perform self-monitoring and adapt the presentation. For Example: Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation. For Example: |
| UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
| Professional development relates to:
Research and plan the content of the presentation in relation to the target audience. For Example: Prepare and organize presentation material. For Example: Apply technical presentation techniques with or without technical equipment. For Example: Display optimal presentation skills. For Example: Perform self-monitoring and adapt the presentation. For Example: Determine and measure the outcome of the presentation. For Example: |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
| As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
| UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
| Demonstration of the knowledge and skills outlined in this unit standard must be consistent with the principles of:
1. Respecting the natural and cultural environment. 2. Accepting and maintaining a non-discriminatory attitude towards diversity including, For example: differences in gender, race, religion, physical ability and culture. |
| QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
| ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
| Core | 49107 | National Certificate: Inspection and Enforcement Services | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | PSETA |
| Core | 67691 | National Diploma: Fitness | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
| Core | 49055 | National Certificate: Foreign Economic Representation | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | PSETA |
| Fundamental | 13741 | Diploma: Occupation-directed Education, Training and Development Practice | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2003-10-11 | Was ETDP SETA until Last Date for Achievement |
| Fundamental | 64649 | Higher Certificate: Early Childhood Development | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
| Fundamental | 48872 | National Certificate: Information Technology (Systems Development) | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MICTS |
| Fundamental | 22902 | National Diploma: Environmental Education, Training and Development Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | ETDP SETA |
| Fundamental | 13742 | Degree: Occupation-directed Education, Training and Development Practice | Level 6 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L6 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Registered" |
2003-10-11 | ETDP SETA |
| Elective | 48962 | Further Education and Training Certificate: Manufacturing and Assembly Logistics (M&AL) | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
| Elective | 97228 | National Certificate: Paralegal Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
| PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
| This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
| 1. | A and N Training Institute Pty LTd |
| 2. | Academy at Vaal Triangle (AVT |
| 3. | Adelaine Training Solutions Pty Ltd |
| 4. | Aubrey Nyiko Business Enterprise cc |
| 5. | Axolemahle Business Enterprise |
| 6. | Belgium Campus 1 |
| 7. | Boland College |
| 8. | Brainwave Careers |
| 9. | Caversham Education Institute |
| 10. | COLLINS SEBOLA FINANCIAL SERVICES (PTY) |
| 11. | Crystal Training and Consultancy Services |
| 12. | Custoda Trust |
| 13. | Damelin Correspondence College (Pty) Ltd |
| 14. | DAPFETC PTY Ltd |
| 15. | DELTA ENVIRONMENTAL CENTRE NPC |
| 16. | Department Of Justice (head Office) |
| 17. | Durban City College |
| 18. | Dynamic ECD Institute |
| 19. | Early Learning Foundation Montessori Teacher Training |
| 20. | Early Learning Resource Unit ELRU |
| 21. | Edu Experts SA |
| 22. | Edu Prof Training Centre |
| 23. | EDUTAK PRE SCHOOL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT |
| 24. | Edutel Skills Development Pty Ltd |
| 25. | Ekasi IT Solutions Centre |
| 26. | ELASON PRO-ACTIVE SECURITY (PTY) LTD |
| 27. | Enjo Consultants Pty Ltd |
| 28. | False Bay Technical Vocational Education Training College |
| 29. | Family Restoration Foundation |
| 30. | Faranang Business and Training Solutions PTY LTD |
| 31. | Finweb Business Consultancy |
| 32. | Flavius Mareka FET College |
| 33. | Foster-Melliar (Pty) Ltd |
| 34. | Free State Training and Development Institute |
| 35. | Get Informed Youth Development Centre |
| 36. | Global Institute for Capacity |
| 37. | Grassroots Adult Education and Training Trust |
| 38. | HILLCROSS BUSINESS SCHOOL (PTY |
| 39. | Hlanganani ICT (Pty) Ltd |
| 40. | Imisebeyelanga Services |
| 41. | Ingwe FET College |
| 42. | IT Academy |
| 43. | K Boneng Consulting Services P |
| 44. | K2014266944 (SA) t/a Hyperion Development |
| 45. | Katiso kuno Consulting |
| 46. | Kez Enterprises and Consulting Pty Ltd |
| 47. | Kgaka Kgolo Institute Pty Ltd |
| 48. | Khanimamba Training And Resource Centre |
| 49. | Kids Paradise Training Centre |
| 50. | Klein Karoo Resource Centre |
| 51. | Lehlabile Emergency Institute |
| 52. | Lesias Educational Services |
| 53. | Lionsden Africa Business Solutions Pty Ltd |
| 54. | LITTLE LEADERS GROUP PTY LTD |
| 55. | Loago Institute Pty Ltd |
| 56. | Marematlou Training Institute |
| 57. | MAS SAFE SECURITY CC |
| 58. | Masikhule Early Childhood Development Centre NPC |
| 59. | Maths Centre Incorporating Sciences |
| 60. | MENTORNET PTY LTD |
| 61. | MIDRAND TRAINING ACADEMY PTY LTD |
| 62. | Mogapi Education Group (Pty) Ltd |
| 63. | Monepe Holdings Pty Ltd |
| 64. | Montessori Teacher Training Centre South Africa |
| 65. | Motheo Training Institute Trust |
| 66. | Moving Ahead Development Agenc |
| 67. | MPIC Projects Pty Ltd |
| 68. | N MAHARAJ ATTORNEYS |
| 69. | NC Compliance Solutions |
| 70. | Ndulita Solutions |
| 71. | New Beginnings Training and Development Organisation |
| 72. | Northlink College |
| 73. | Orchards Graduate School Pty Ltd |
| 74. | OXY TRADING 735 CC |
| 75. | Peritum Agri Institute PTY Ltd |
| 76. | Petra institute of Development PTY Ltd |
| 77. | PMA Holding Pty Ltd |
| 78. | PNJ TRAINING ACADEMY NPC |
| 79. | Port Elizabeth TVET College |
| 80. | QUARPHIX (PTY) LTD |
| 81. | QUBELISA MTIYA SKILLS DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY (PTY) LTD |
| 82. | RAMAZWI SECURITY SERVICES CC |
| 83. | Redefine Human Capital (PTY) L |
| 84. | Redefined Skills Training and Development |
| 85. | Retshetse Training Project |
| 86. | Richfield Graduate Institute of Technology Pty Ltd |
| 87. | Right 4 u College PTY Ltd |
| 88. | Rostec Technical FET College (Pty) Ltd |
| 89. | Seriti Institute NPC |
| 90. | Shintsha Skills Development Pty Ltd |
| 91. | Siphiwosethu Open Development Initiative Corporation |
| 92. | Sisanda Traders Pty Ltd |
| 93. | Siyahluma Education Institute PTY Ltd |
| 94. | SIYANIVIKELA SECURITY SERVICES |
| 95. | SOUTH AFRICAN LAW SCHOOL |
| 96. | SOUTH AFRICAN LAW SCHOOL RANDBURG |
| 97. | South West Gauteng TVET College |
| 98. | Sunshine Community Outreach Ministry of Youth With A Mission |
| 99. | T Mabuya Associates Pty Ltd |
| 100. | TDM Management Consulting Pty Ltd |
| 101. | Teachers Learning Centre Pty Ltd |
| 102. | Tembe Service Providers |
| 103. | Thasha Training and Consulting |
| 104. | The College of Modern Montessori |
| 105. | The Finishing College (Pty) Lt |
| 106. | The Iscariota Group Pty Ltd |
| 107. | The Read Institute NPC |
| 108. | The Wellness Specialist |
| 109. | Thukakgaladi Integrated Development Project |
| 110. | Tinotel Communications |
| 111. | Titan Trade Technologies |
| 112. | Tlharihani Training Centre Pty Ltd |
| 113. | Tlotliso Enterprise Pty Ltd |
| 114. | TORQUE TECHNICAL COMPUTER TRAINING PTY LTD |
| 115. | Train 2 Teach Pty Ltd |
| 116. | Tshase Education Group Pty Ltd |
| 117. | Tshianzi Development |
| 118. | Tshwane South College for ECD Academy |
| 119. | Ubuntu Care and Development |
| 120. | Unathi Training |
| 121. | Universal College Outcomes SA |
| 122. | Varsity Institute of Science & Technology (Pty)Ltd |
| 123. | VERYCOOLIDEAS |
| 124. | VH Consulting |
| 125. | Vuselela TVET College |
| 126. | Wellinkwise Pty Ltd |
| 127. | West Coast TVET College |
| 128. | WESTERN COLLEGE FOR FURTHER EDUCATION AND TRAINING |
| 129. | Whitestone College |
| 130. | WonderKids Academy |
| 131. | World Wide Education Providers Pty Ltd |
| 132. | Yellow Media Learning Institute Pty Ltd |
| 133. | ZA WIT (PTY) LTD |
| All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |