All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Implement new projects in a rubber manufacturing and assembly process |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
12669 | Implement new projects in a rubber manufacturing and assembly process | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Manufacturing and Assembly Processes | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Manufacturing and Assembly | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 30 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The skills, values and knowledge reflected in this unit standard are required by people in the field of rubber technology.
Qualifying learners are able to plan, implement and monitor a range of projects: The learner is able to apply project management skills to manage projects related to common commercial rubber applications. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
The credits allocated to this unit standard assume that learners have already learned to:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The scope and level of this unit standard is limited to common commercial rubber applications and is determined by the ranges as indicated under the specific outcomes.
The learner should be able to work autonomously. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Determine project requirements. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Project plan is formulated with performance indicators. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Project is completed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Feasibility of implementing project results is determined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Report is generated and applicable persons are briefed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Research the availability of local project expertise. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Project plan is formulated with performance indicators. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Project is completed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Feasibility of implementing project results is determined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Report is generated and applicable persons are briefed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Select and brief project team. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Project plan is formulated with performance indicators. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Project is completed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Feasibility of implementing project results is determined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Report is generated and applicable persons are briefed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Collect project data from a variety of sources. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Project plan is formulated with performance indicators. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Project is completed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Feasibility of implementing project results is determined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Report is generated and applicable persons are briefed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Formulate project plan and performance indicators and present plan to affected parties. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Project plan is formulated with performance indicators. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Project is completed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Feasibility of implementing project results is determined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Report is generated and applicable persons are briefed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 6 |
Manage the implementation of the project. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Project plan is formulated with performance indicators. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Project is completed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Feasibility of implementing project results is determined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Report is generated and applicable persons are briefed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 7 |
Sign off project and compile project report. |
OUTCOME NOTES |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Project plan is formulated with performance indicators. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Project is completed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Feasibility of implementing project results is determined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Report is generated and applicable persons are briefed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 8 |
Brief applicable persons on way forward. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Project plan is formulated with performance indicators. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Project is completed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Feasibility of implementing project results is determined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Report is generated and applicable persons are briefed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 9 |
Discuss and explain project planning, management and implementation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Project plan is formulated with performance indicators. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. Project is completed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. Feasibility of implementing project results is determined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Report is generated and applicable persons are briefed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION NOTES |
Indicators:
1. Documents and reports are accurate 2. No delays are caused as a result of poor project planning 3. Project is commissioned and signed off within agreed timeframe 4. Project costs are within the agreed budget Understanding confirmed: 1. Respond to questions and entering into discussions with respect to: |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
The assessment will be governed by the policies and guidelines of the MERSETA Education and Training Quality Assuror who has jurisdiction over this field of learning. The assessor will (at the very least) be accredited and have a technical qualification in this learning area.
The learner can be assessed in the language of his/her choice although s/he has to report incidents or conditions to someone else. The learner will be assessed on his/her ability to report in the language commonly used in his/her working environment. The learner will be assessed in the workplace but s/he can submit documents, projects, test results and assignments that were not produced in the workplace. The learner can be assessed against this unit standard to obtain credits or as part of an integrated assessment for a qualification. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Names & functions of:
Purpose of: Processes, events, causes and effects, implications: Procedures and techniques: Regulations, legislation, agreements, policies, standards: Theory: rules, principles, laws: Relationships, systems: |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage myself and my activities
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically
|
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems
|
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 22774 | National Diploma: Rubber Technology | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
Fundamental | 48730 | National Certificate: Maintenance of High-speed Production Processes (Fast-moving Consumer Goods) | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2015-06-30 | FOODBEV |
Elective | 23260 | National Certificate: Industrial Rubber Manufacturing: Mixing OR Extruding OR Moulding OR Calendaring | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | MERSETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |