All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Demonstrate an understanding of procedure in courts and other fora |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
119503 | Demonstrate an understanding of procedure in courts and other fora | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Legal Education and Training | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 08 - Law, Military Science and Security | Justice in Society | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 5 | Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L5 | 20 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2026-06-30 | 2029-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
The learner who achieves this unit standard will be able to apply a practical understanding of procedures in South African courts and other fora.
The qualifying learner will be able to: |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
The learner accessing this unit standard is assumed to have the ability to:
|
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
Range statements are included with specific outcomes as necessary.
Forum or fora refers to quasi-judicial and non-judicial institutuions established to settle disputes.These may include commissions, ombudmen or any structure established by law or sectoral agreements. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Explain how formal law interacts with other areas of law within the South African legal framework. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The different areas of law are discussed within the South African legal framework. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Different areas of law include main categories of law. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The position of formal law is explained within the South African legal framework. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The concepts substantive law and formal law are compared. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The main objectives of the rules of procedure, and evidence are identified. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Apply information from the sources of South African court procedure to a given scenario. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The sources of South African procedure and evidence are listed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The main areas of South African law are discussed in terms of a given scenario. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Legal sources and materials of formal law are identified in terms of a given scenario. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Material is evaluated to lead to a solution in a given scenario. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
A solution is determined taking into account influencing factors in terms of a given scenario. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Influencing factors include legal resources and the interests of the client. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Identify the appropriate forum for the resolution of civil and criminal matters within the South African legal context. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
The civil and criminal courts and other fora in South Africa are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
The participants in the civil and criminal courts and other fora are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The concept of locus standi is applied. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The concept of jurisdiction is defined. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
The principles and rules relating to the civil and criminal jurisdiction of the courts and other fora are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
The principles and rules relating to the civil and criminal jurisdiction of the courts and other fora are applied to a given factual situation. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The forum to enforce a legal remedy in a given factual situation is selected. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the procedure in a selected court or forum. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Procedures are explained in sequence in terms of the selected court or forum. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Preparatory activities are explained in sequence in terms of the selected court or forum. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
The options available to the parties during a given civil and criminal matter are explained with reference to the selected court or forum. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
The option to be taken in a given civil and criminal matter is determined in terms of influencing factors. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Influencing factors include the use of the legal authorities and the interests of the client. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Advantages and consequences of the chosen option for a given civil and criminal matter are explained. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Precedents in litigation for a given civil and criminal matter are explored. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 7 |
The effect of a judgement or order in a given civil and criminal matter is discussed. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 8 |
Execution of a judgement or order is explained in sequence in terms of a selected court or forum. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 5 |
Demonstrate knowledge of the laws of evidence in civil and criminal cases. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
Sources of the South African laws of evidence are listed in terms of civil and criminal cases. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
Concepts of standard of proof and burden of proof are discussed in terms of civil and criminal cases. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
Different kinds of evidence are identified. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
Rules relating to relevance and admissibility of furnishing evidence are fully described in terms of civil and criminal cases. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
Ways in which proof may be furnished and evidence adduced are described. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
Rules relating to privilege and sufficiency of evidence are discussed. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
Moderation must include both internal and external moderation of assessments. Moderation of assessments will be overseen by the relevant ETQA according to the moderation guidelines and agreed ETQA procedures. This unit standard can be internally assessed by assessors of the provider and moderated by a moderator registered by the relevant ETQA. Moderation shall comply with SAQA requirements.
Anyone assessing a learner or moderating the assessment of a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with the relevant ETQA. |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
The learner will be able to demonstrate an understanding of:
|
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve specified problems in civil or criminal procedure taking into consideration the best interest of the client. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING |
Work effectively with others as a member of a team, organisation or as a role-player in the legal fraternity. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING |
Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information necessary for resolving issues related to procedure or evidence. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use technology effectively and responsibly. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
N/A |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Core | 97228 | National Certificate: Paralegal Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | As per Learning Programmes recorded against this Qual |
Core | 50023 | National Diploma: Legal Interpreting | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
Core | 49598 | National Diploma: Paralegal Practice | Level 5 | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
Core | 90657 | National Certificate: Prosecuting | Not Applicable | NQF Level 05 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2023-06-30 | SAS SETA |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
1. | ABBA THEKGA CONSULTING |
2. | ADVANCED RISK SOLUTIONS 10000 (PTY) LTD |
3. | AFRIC POLICING INSTITUTE |
4. | ARKE LEGAL ADVISORS |
5. | BITLINE SA 368 CC |
6. | Chithi Holdings |
7. | COLLINS SEBOLA FINANCIAL SERVICES (PTY) |
8. | CRANE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY DURBAN |
9. | CRANE INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY MIDDLEBURG |
10. | CRANE INTERNATIONAL BURGERSFORT |
11. | CRANE SKILLS TRAINING ACDEMY INTERNATIONAL |
12. | Department Of Justice (head Office) |
13. | E E L PROTECTION SERVICES |
14. | ELASON PRO-ACTIVE SECURITY (PTY) LTD |
15. | ENGIE SECURITY SERVICES TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTRE PTY LTD |
16. | GREEN MARKET SQUARE T/A SA LAW SCHOOL PRETORIA |
17. | HJN POLOKWANE BRANCH PTY LTD |
18. | HJN PROTORIA BRANCH 02 |
19. | HJN TRAINING CC |
20. | Ikhwezi Training Institute (Pty) Ltd |
21. | JEPPE COLLEGE OF COMMERCE AND COMPUTER |
22. | Legaelamatlo Development and Projects |
23. | LUCENT EDUCATION PTY LTD |
24. | MANDULO FOUNDATION |
25. | MAS SAFE SECURITY CC |
26. | MIDRAND TRAINING ACADEMY PTY LTD |
27. | MY KIDS EMPIRE INVESTMENTS AND PROJECTS |
28. | N MAHARAJ ATTORNEYS |
29. | NETWORK FOR CAREER DEVELOPMENT |
30. | OXY TRADING 735 CC |
31. | QUBELISA MTIYA SKILLS DEVELOPMENT ACADEMY (PTY) LTD |
32. | RAMAZWI SECURITY SERVICES CC |
33. | Redefined Skills Training & Development (Pty) Ltd |
34. | RI A LINDA SECURITY SOLUTIONS |
35. | SA PROTECTION AND SECURITY UNIT (PTY) LTD |
36. | SDC Security and Safety Pty Ltd |
37. | SHAMARIAH SECURITY AND TRAINING |
38. | SIYANIVIKELA SECURITY SERVICES |
39. | SOUTH AFRICAN LAW SCHOOL |
40. | SOUTH AFRICAN LAW SCHOOL RANDBURG |
41. | The Institute of Paralegal Practice Development and Research |
42. | UNLOCK INNOVATIONS (PTY) LTD |
43. | VISHAL JUNKEEPARSAD AND COMPANY INC |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |