SAQA All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY 
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: 

Accommodate cultural reference systems 
SAQA US ID UNIT STANDARD TITLE
116807  Accommodate cultural reference systems 
ORIGINATOR
SGB Translation, Interpreting and Language Editing 
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY
-  
FIELD SUBFIELD
Field 04 - Communication Studies and Language Communication Studies 
ABET BAND UNIT STANDARD TYPE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL CREDITS
Undefined  Regular  Level 7  Level TBA: Pre-2009 was L7  15 
REGISTRATION STATUS REGISTRATION START DATE REGISTRATION END DATE SAQA DECISION NUMBER
Passed the End Date -
Status was "Reregistered" 		 2018-07-01  2023-06-30  SAQA 06120/18 
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT
2024-06-30   2027-06-30  

In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise.  

This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. 

PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD 
The purpose of the learning is to enable learners to accommodate cultural reference systems. This will promote communication between the cultures and contribute to accurate interpretation of the source message.

Credited learners are capable of:
  • Assessing cultural requirements of interpreting context
  • Analysing cultural reference systems in specific contexts
  • Evaluating implications of cultural reference systems for interpreting in specific contexts
  • Selecting strategies that accommodate specific cultural reference systems 
    		•

    LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING 
    The credits and level assigned to this unit standard is based on the assumption that learners have already attained the following competencies:
  • Analyse and communicate information
  • Communicate effectively using language skills in two languages
  • Situate messages in terms of culture 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD RANGE 
    The typical scope of this unit standard is competence relating to the interpreting within professional contexts

    The context of this unit standard includes:
  • Legal interpreting (including high court)
  • Booth, or whispered interpreting
  • Business interpreting (this may include commercial transacting)
  • Diplomatic service interpreting
  • Health interpreting - mental health
  • Conference interpreting
  • Educational interpreting
  • Parliamentary/Legislature/Local Government Council interpreting 
    		•

    Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 
    Assess cultural requirements of interpreting context. 
    OUTCOME RANGE 
    Cultural requirements can include those relevant for parties, institutions, etc. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Target and source cultures are correctly identified 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Cultural idiosyncrasies are correctly identified 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Requirements for dealing with the cultural idiosyncrasies are correctly identified 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Cultural requirements are assessed in terms of required action 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 
    Analyse cultural reference systems in specific contexts. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Knowledge of the source cultural reference system is incorporated into the reception of the source language 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Knowledge of the target cultural reference system is incorporated into the preparation of the target language 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Analysis of the message integrates an understanding of the cultural reference systems 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Analysis of the cultural reference systems involves an understanding of register and situation 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 
    Evaluate implications of cultural reference systems for interpreting in specific contexts. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Comparison and contrasting of the cultural reference system of the source language with the cultural reference system of the target language is justified in terms of identifiable features 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Possible adaptations are considered that would accommodate both source and target cultural systems 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Selection of these adaptations is measured against situational restraints including time 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    Evaluation of the implication of the cultural reference systems of all parties concerned incorporates prior knowledge and experience 

    SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 
    Select strategies that accommodate specific cultural reference systems. 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERIA     

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 
    Strategies selected are in agreement with the cultural reference systems of the source language 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 
    Strategies selected are in agreement with the cultural reference systems of the target language 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 
    Strategies selected are suitable for the interpreting assignments 

    ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 
    The selection of strategies is justified in terms of specific requirements for accommodating cultural reference systems 


    UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS 
  • Assessment of learner achievements takes place at providers accredited by a relevant ETQA (RSA, 1998b) for the provision of programs that result in the outcomes specified for this unit standard.
  • Anyone assessing a learner against this unit standard must be registered as an assessor with a relevant ETQA.
  • Any institution offering learning that will enable achievement of this unit standard must be accredited as a provider with a relevant ETQA.
  • The relevant ETQA according to the moderation guidelines and the agreed ETQA procedures will oversee moderation of assessment and is responsible for moderation of learner achievements of learners who meet the requirements of this unit standard. 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE 
    Credited learners understand and can explain:
  • Structure, register and style of source and target messages
  • The role of the discourse field in relation to source and target messages
  • Cultural context of source and target messages
  • Source and target messages' norms and conventions
  • Communication barriers
  • Ethical requirements
  • Quality criteria 
    		•

    UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME 
    N/A 

    UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES 
    N/A 


    Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING 
    Identify and solve problems where responses to problems show that such critical and creative thinking has been used to make responsible decisions when evaluating implications of cultural reference systems for interpreting in specific contexts 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO WORKING 
    Work effectively with others as a member of a team, group, organisation or community when assessing cultural requirements of interpreting context 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING 
    Organise and manage oneself and one's activities responsibly and effectively when selecting strategies that accommodate specific cultural reference systems 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COLLECTING 
    Collect, analyse, organise and critically evaluate information when analysing cultural reference systems in specific contexts 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING 
    Communicate effectively using visual, mathematic and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written presentation when assessing cultural requirements of interpreting context 

    UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING 
    Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation when interpreting in general 

    UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA 
    Assessors should keep the following principles in mind when designing and conducting assessments against this unit standard:
  • Focus the assessment activities on gathering evidence in terms of the main outcome expressed in the title to ensure assessment is integrated rather than fragmented. Remember we want to declare the person competent in terms of the title. Where assessment at title level is unmanageable, then focus assessment around each specific outcome, or groups of specific outcomes.
  • Make sure evidence is gathered across the entire range, wherever it applies. Assessment activities should be as close to the real performance as possible, and where simulations or role-plays are used, there should be supporting evidence to show the learner is able to perform in the real situation.
  • Do not focus the assessment activities on each assessment criterion. Rather make sure the assessment activities focus on outcomes and are sufficient to enable evidence to be gathered around all the assessment criteria.
  • The assessment criteria provide the specifications against which assessment judgements should be made. In most cases, knowledge can be inferred from the quality of the performances, but in other cases, knowledge and understanding will have to be tested through questioning techniques. Where this is required, there will be assessment criteria to specify the standard required.
  • The task of the assessor is to gather sufficient evidence, of the prescribed type and quality, as specified in this unit standard, that the learner can achieve the outcomes again and again and again. This means assessors will have to judge how many repeat performances are required before they believe the performance is reproducible.
  • All assessments should be conducted in line with the following well documented principles of assessment: appropriateness, fairness, manageability, integration into work or learning, validity, direct, authentic, sufficient, systematic, open and consistent 
    		•

    REREGISTRATION HISTORY 
    As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. 

    UNIT STANDARD NOTES 
    N/A 

    QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
      ID QUALIFICATION TITLE PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL NQF LEVEL STATUS END DATE PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY
    Core  49062   National Diploma: Interpreting  Level 7  Level N/A: Pre-2009 was L7  Passed the End Date -
    Status was "Reregistered"     		 2018-12-31  CHE 


    PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: 
    This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here.
     
    NONE 


    All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source.