All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |
SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY |
REGISTERED UNIT STANDARD THAT HAS PASSED THE END DATE: |
Formulate and adjust recipes for plant baking products |
SAQA US ID | UNIT STANDARD TITLE | |||
10705 | Formulate and adjust recipes for plant baking products | |||
ORIGINATOR | ||||
SGB Food | ||||
PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QUALITY ASSURANCE FUNCTIONARY | ||||
- | ||||
FIELD | SUBFIELD | |||
Field 06 - Manufacturing, Engineering and Technology | Manufacturing and Assembly | |||
ABET BAND | UNIT STANDARD TYPE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | CREDITS |
Undefined | Regular | Level 4 | NQF Level 04 | 5 |
REGISTRATION STATUS | REGISTRATION START DATE | REGISTRATION END DATE | SAQA DECISION NUMBER | |
Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2018-07-01 | 2023-06-30 | SAQA 06120/18 | |
LAST DATE FOR ENROLMENT | LAST DATE FOR ACHIEVEMENT | |||
2024-06-30 | 2027-06-30 |
In all of the tables in this document, both the pre-2009 NQF Level and the NQF Level is shown. In the text (purpose statements, qualification rules, etc), any references to NQF Levels are to the pre-2009 levels unless specifically stated otherwise. |
This unit standard does not replace any other unit standard and is not replaced by any other unit standard. |
PURPOSE OF THE UNIT STANDARD |
A person credited with this unit standard is able to:
This unit standard is intended for a person working in a plant baking environment who is responsible for interpreting, formulating, testing, adjusting and cost balancing recipes for plant bread products. Range: Two different formulating, testing, costing and documenting procedures must be completed. This unit standard will contribute to the full development of the learner with in the baking environment by providing recognition, further mobility and transportability within the field of manufacturing and assembly. The skills, knowledge and understanding demonstrated within this unit standard are essential for social and economic transformation and contribute to the upliftment and economic growth within the baking environment. |
LEARNING ASSUMED TO BE IN PLACE AND RECOGNITION OF PRIOR LEARNING |
Description of required skills and knowledge:
Knowledge on baking ingredient functionality, purpose and composition. Sound knowledge and skills regarding plant bread processing. Applied knowledge regarding accounting principles. |
UNIT STANDARD RANGE |
The scope of this unit standard is to interpret, formulate, test and cost balance recipes for plant bread products in a plant baking environment.
In the context of this unit standard two different formulating, testing, costing and documenting procedures for plant bread products development must be completed. The level assigned to this unit standard is applicable because the process requires a wide range of technical skills and offers a considerable choice of procedures. A broad knowledge base incorporating some theoretical concepts, analytical interpretation of information, informed judgements and a range of sometime innovative responses to concrete but often unfamiliar problems are employed. The application of the unit standard is to qualify a person towards certification in advance trade and technical occupations. |
Specific Outcomes and Assessment Criteria: |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 1 |
Formulate and balance recipes for plant bread products. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The guidelines of the specified products are interpreted and explained according to principles and methodology recipe development. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. The constraints affecting recipe formulation are identified and explained according to recipe development principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Constraints that affect recipe development refer to cost, production requirements, skills and equipment. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. The methodology of recipe construction and balance are interpreted and explained according to plant bread recipe principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. The recipe for specific product is formulated according to recipe formulation methodologies, food safety, ingredient functionality and bakers percentage method. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Formulation of recipes includes past experience, existing recipes and literature. The bakers percentage method refers to expressing all other ingredients as a percentage of the flour component which is always 100 %. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 5 |
5. The recipe is re-formulated and adjusted according to principles and methodology recipe development. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Re-formulation refers to no-conformance of products intended quality specifications. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 6 |
6. Tested, formulated recipe is increased to production size and requirements according to standard operating procedures. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 2 |
Test and adjust the formulated recipes for plant bread products. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The specified plant bread product is manufactured according to the formulated recipe formulation and methodology. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. The procedures, ingredients and equipment used during testing period are recorded in given format according to recording policy and procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Procedures refer to weights, temperatures, time periods, yield, baking methodology, procedures and cooling. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. The finished manufactured product is assessed according to the quality control specifications, product formulation brief and baking principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Quality control specifications include internal and external appearance, touch, taste and aroma. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 4 |
4. Problems regarding products not conforming to specifications are solved, corrective action, re-formulation and re-testing are done according to recipe formulation and testing methodology. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 3 |
Document recipe specifications for plant bread products. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. Tested, formulated product recipe specifications are documented and stored according standard operating procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Specifications refer to ingredients, qualities, percentages, method, baking instructions and shelf life. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. The food and personal safety procedures and policies for the tested, formulated product must be documented according to standard operating procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. The process parameters, quality control and assurance standards are documented according to standard operating procedures. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION RANGE |
Quality control standards include internal and external appearance, yield, shelf-life, touch, taste, aroma and packaging. |
SPECIFIC OUTCOME 4 |
Calculate the direct cost of the finished products. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 1 |
1. The cost of the raw materials and packaging materials per unit are calculated according to accounting principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 2 |
2. The yield based on the unit weight or portion size is calculated according to accounting principles. |
ASSESSMENT CRITERION 3 |
3. A selling price with required gross profit margin is determined according to accounting and economic principles. |
UNIT STANDARD ACCREDITATION AND MODERATION OPTIONS |
UNIT STANDARD ESSENTIAL EMBEDDED KNOWLEDGE |
Embedded knowledge is reflected within the assessment criteria of each specific outcome. |
UNIT STANDARD DEVELOPMENTAL OUTCOME |
N/A |
UNIT STANDARD LINKAGES |
N/A |
Critical Cross-field Outcomes (CCFO): |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO IDENTIFYING |
Identify and solve problems in which response displays that responsible decisions, using critical and creative thinking, have been made.
Evident in all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO ORGANISING |
Organise and manage oneself and one`s activities responsibly and effectively.
Evident in all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO COMMUNICATING |
Communicate effectively by using mathematical and/or language skills in the modes of oral and/or written presentations.
Evident in all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO SCIENCE |
Use science and technology effectively and critically, showing responsibility towards the environment and health of others.
Evident in all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO DEMONSTRATING |
Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem solving contexts do not exist in isolation.
Evident in all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD CCFO CONTRIBUTING |
Contribute to the full personal development of each learner and the social and economic development of the society at large.
Evident in all specific outcomes. |
UNIT STANDARD ASSESSOR CRITERIA |
N/A |
REREGISTRATION HISTORY |
As per the SAQA Board decision/s at that time, this unit standard was Reregistered in 2012; 2015. |
UNIT STANDARD NOTES |
Supplementary Information:
1. Legal requirements: The following acts and codes, current and future regulations and amendments will be applicable. 2. Definition of terms within this unit standard: Terminology: Clarification/ explanation/ definition. Food safety practices and procedures Standard operating procedures |
QUALIFICATIONS UTILISING THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
ID | QUALIFICATION TITLE | PRE-2009 NQF LEVEL | NQF LEVEL | STATUS | END DATE | PRIMARY OR DELEGATED QA FUNCTIONARY | |
Elective | 20658 | National Certificate: Food and Beverage Processing: Plant Baking Processing | Level 3 | NQF Level 03 | Passed the End Date - Status was "Reregistered" |
2015-06-30 | FOODBEV |
PROVIDERS CURRENTLY ACCREDITED TO OFFER THIS UNIT STANDARD: |
This information shows the current accreditations (i.e. those not past their accreditation end dates), and is the most complete record available to SAQA as of today. Some Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionaries have a lag in their recording systems for provider accreditation, in turn leading to a lag in notifying SAQA of all the providers that they have accredited to offer qualifications and unit standards, as well as any extensions to accreditation end dates. The relevant Primary or Delegated Quality Assurance Functionary should be notified if a record appears to be missing from here. |
NONE |
All qualifications and part qualifications registered on the National Qualifications Framework are public property. Thus the only payment that can be made for them is for service and reproduction. It is illegal to sell this material for profit. If the material is reproduced or quoted, the South African Qualifications Authority (SAQA) should be acknowledged as the source. |